Category Archives: Photos

Edith Garrud: Suffragette Martial Artist

Edith Garrud

Edith Garrud

One of the great assets the suffragette movement had in the early 1900s was a female jiu-jitsu instructor by the name of Edith Garrud.

Garrud’s contribution to the movement was to teach suffragettes practical self-defense tips in the face of hostile, violent men.

Sarah wrote about Garrud for Fightland.

To read the full story go here.

Leave a comment

Filed under Culture, Jock Stuff, Photos, Shameless Promotion

Is Headbanging Dangerous?

To bang or not to bang

To bang or not to bang

Being a heavy metal fan comes with certain dangers — and that doesn’t include the risk of possession by the devil.

No, these dangers are far more of the brain, neck and spine variety and the culprit is… headbanging.

Sarah spoke to some health professionals about the risk of ‘banging for Consequence Of Sound’s Component section.

To read the story — and how to prevent metal onset brain injury — go here.

Leave a comment

Filed under Concerts, Photos, Shameless Promotion

Fleetwood Mac’s Mick Fleetwood Gets Photographic

Mick Fleetwood of Fleetwood Mac

Mick Fleetwood of Fleetwood Mac

Fleetwood Mac have recently welcomed Christine McVie back to their touring lineup. Titular head Mick Fleetwood has been making news for something different, however — his photographs.

The musician has apparently been taking photos for years and has been showing them off at galleries while on the Mac’s current tour.

Sarah spoke to him about it for Huffington Post Music Canada.

To read the story go here.

Leave a comment

Filed under Art, Music, Photos, Shameless Promotion

Celebrity Nude Photos: Tips For Red-Blooded Males Who Don’t Want To Be The Worst

Jennifer Lawrence nude.

Jennifer Lawrence nude.

Last night someone dumped numerous hacked nude, intimate photos of female celebrities like Jennifer Lawrence and Kirsten Dunst on the internet.

This morning I said the following about it on my Facebook wall:

“I think today’s learning lesson is that under no circumstance should you ever taken nude photos of yourself with your phone. Or, probably, ever. For any reason.”

It was then brought to my attention very quickly that this response constituted victim blaming.

On more thoughtful analysis I’ve got to concede that it’s true… it was victim blaming. That wasn’t my intention, though. I just wasn’t looking at this as a human issue, a violation, I was looking at it as a data issue.

As in…

a) If you own a smart phone, computer or tablet, and …
b) You create, then store and/or transfer sensitive images and material…
c) By definition of the various terms of service everyone has agreed to for various apps, devices, softwares, etc…
d) As well as proven tinfoil hat truths exhibited by Snowden and the existence of algorithms that can detect boobs. Then…
e) It’s reasonable to conclude that no binary digital data a person creates can at present be considered safe, “private” and/or secure. Therefore…
f) The only way to prevent nude photos of yourself ever leaking on the internet is to never take them.

Looking at the photo hacking issue strictly through this lens, I now realize, is inadequate.

This, because, although “no nude pics ever” may provide a technically perfect solution to not having one’s intimate vagina photos circle the internet, it doesn’t actually do anything to punish the hackers/invaders/digital pervs. And, more importantly, it doesn’t address the fact that these people have violated the autonomy of another human being. These creepers essentially committed targeted digital attacks on a series of women. This, all right-thinking people can agree, is wrong.

So, if my solution was inadequate, what can us fellas do to man-up about this?

Well…

1) Don’t do things like hack women’s phones, emails, etc. And don’t participate in that spreading-photos-of-your-ex culture (that’s actually mentally insane, bro). This stuff seems obvious, but it probably needs to be stated as baseline. If in doubt, don’t contribute to evil.

2) Don’t enable it. Look, it’s not a crime to wonder if McKayla Maroney’s thigh muscles are bigger than yours. But by actively clicking/hunting/seeking these hack photos, you’re part of the problem. If you want to look at McKayla Maroney pics, her Instagram account is probably the exact amount she wants strangers to see of her. And no more than that.

3) Dick pics. “Yeah, well. Male athletes and boy bands get hacked, too,” I said, trying to argue a certain equality. And yes, when male celebs do get hacked it’s just as much a violation to them as it is when it happens to women. The flipside — and it’s a vital tangental connection to all this — is that when celebrity dick pics surface a percentage of these pop ups happen because dudes have sent unwanted, unsolicited nudes to women.

We can all establish this is gross, right? Apparently this a problem women have to deal with all the time (I had no idea, honestly). I don’t understand it and I’ve got no data to back this up, but this has got to be an even less effective courting technique then yelling, “Nice tittttsss, baby!” at a woman walking down the sidewalk. So let’s keep it simple fellas: any unsolicited dick pics you’ve ever sent to a woman are allowed be distributed to, and roundly mocked in a public manner by her and all her friends. And if you suffer an Anthony Weiner-like fall from grace because of it, well, you deserve it.

4) Freedom. If, like me, you continue to have an imperfect-though-wanting-to-be-sympathetic grasp on the gender-safety-equality issues surrounding this, you should still be able to understand it from a liberty-and-ramifications perspective.

Basically, when the spectre of internet creepoids peeking in the digital drawers looms over all women then that means they can’t do and act as they want. When women can’t act and do what they want, that means their liberty and freedom is being taken away. This, fundamentally, is not right.

Leave a comment

Filed under Culture, Photos

The Destruction Of 25 Roehampton Avenue

25 Roehampton Avenue.

The destruction of 25 Roehampton Avenue

Midtown Toronto is in the midst of a construction boom. Three of the four corners at epicentral intersection Yonge and Eglinton are in varying degrees of construction and the surrounding neighbourhood has no less than 632 separate mostly-condo development projects in the works.

One such project is happening right now at 25 Roehampton Avenue.

The problem? There’s an existing building currently in the way of progress.

Not for long, though.

Here’s what the dismantling of the 25 building looked like on the afternoon of Monday, April 28…

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

 

Leave a comment

Filed under Photos